For Christmas I received a fascinating gift from a pal - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (excellent title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of basic prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and very funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and systemcheck-wiki.de is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and extremely verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, because rotating from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book includes a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered even more.

He wants to widen his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated items to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it most likely took less than a minute to produce, annunciogratis.net and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we actually suggest human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is images. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not think using generative AI for innovative purposes need to be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's develop it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually decided to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is weakening one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear pledge of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to help them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national data library containing public information from a wide variety of sources will also be made readily available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, amongst other things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the functions of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of lawsuits against AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New York Times to authors, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the minute, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weak point in generative AI tools for bigger projects. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to read in parts due to the fact that it's so long-winded.

But offered how rapidly the tech is developing, I'm not sure for how long I can remain positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.